Pac-12: Analyzing the candidates for conference expansion

Pac-12
Pac-12 Logo

Unlikely

University of Kansas

Rock Chalk Jayhawk!

Kansas is college basketball royalty. They are second to only Kentucky (four behind) in all-time wins. Imagine what it would be like to see an annual UCLA-Kansas hoops matchup. That is television gold.

Football-wise, KU is an also-ran. Actually, that’s a slap in the face of also-rans. The Jayhawks had three winning seasons this century and are 500-635-54 all-time. Maybe in a different conference, their fortunes could change, but it’s hard to fathom.

Speculation about the Jayhawks in the Pac-12 is mostly moot. Reportedly, the Big Ten is interested in KU. It’s a better fit for the school. If not the Big Ten, then the ACC.

Kansas State

The Wildcats are Kansas-lite, without the reputation. Aside from the Bill Snyder era, KSU is a failure.

Also, no one will confuse Manhattan, Kansas, with Manhattan, New York as a media market. Throw in that their home stadium capacity would rank ninth in the current Pac-12; Kansas State doesn’t bring nearly enough to the table.

If K-State gets picked up by a new conference, they are on the buddy plan with KU.

Colorado State

Except for Colorado and Utah, every Pac-12 team has a geographic rival. CSU would be that for the Buffaloes. Otherwise, the Rams are pretty blah as a Pac-12 school. They don’t bring much cache’ with them in athletics. Adding them won’t add many more eyes on TVs. Besides, the Buffs have that market wrapped up.

Next: Page 3 – Dipping a toe in the water

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Share: